Expert Opinions: Dr. George A. Scangas MD
Instructor, Department of Otolaryngology -
Head and Neck Surgery
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary (MEEI) -
Harvard Medical School (USA)
George A. Scangas MD graduated from the University of
Pennsylvania (undergraduate and medical degrees) and was trained in
Otolaryngology -Head and Neck Surgery at Massachusetts Eye and Ear (MEE) /
Harvard Medical School (HMS). He completed a rhinology/skull base fellowship at
Harvard. At present Dr. Scangas serves as Instructor in Otolaryngology
(MEEI/HMS). He has published extensively in the fields of rhinology and
sinus/skull base surgery. Dr. Scangas’s primary research interests include
chronic rhinosinusitis, anterior skull base surgery, endoscopic sinus surgery,
patient-reported outcome measures, and healthcare economics.
Read below, his very interesting answers to
THE HEAD AND NECK BLOG!
Dr. Scangas, why
did you choose to specialize in Otolaryngology? What attracted you in the field
then and what attracts you now?
It
all began in medical school at Penn in the anatomy lab. While most students
preferred the anatomy of the heart or GI tract, I was fascinated by the
complexity of the cranial nerves and the anterior skull base. Soon after I
shadowed Dr. David Kennedy, the pioneer of endoscopic sinus surgery in the US,
and was further drawn to the field of Otolaryngology and specificially
Rhinology. His mentorship was invaluable to me during my medical school years.
At Harvard, Dr. Ralph Metson took me under his wing during residency and fellowship
and really helped me identify my research interests. Aside from the interesting
disease processes and the joy of taking care of patients, the wonderful aspect
of Otolaryngology remains the camaraderie in the field between surgeons,
residents and medical students. It is truly a pleasure to work and teach in
this field.
You are subspecialized
in Rhinology and Skull Base Surgery. What makes it special for you? Could you
briefly describe a typical working week of yours?
An
incredibly rewarding aspect of my subspecialty is that 50% of my practice
involves treating non-terminal diseases and improving patient quality of life,
while the other 50% is more focused on malignancies of the anterior skull base
and requires working closely with Neurosurgery and Ophthalmology. Both types of
patients are incredibly rewarding to treat, and the variety helps keep things
interesting both in clinic and in the OR. In a typical week, I usually have 2
days of seeing patients in clinic, 1 or 2 days of anterior skull base surgery,
1 day of endoscopic sinus surgery, and 0-1 academic days.
You have a significant number of contributions in the scientific
literature of your field (314 citations as of March 2019). How are you
combining research activity and clinical practice and how has it helped your
career so far? How do you see the role of Surgeon-Scientists in modern
healthcare?
Research
is critical in my opinion for an academic surgeon. Not only does it keep you up
to date on new discoveries and findings in the literature, it gives you a focus
outside of patient care and helps connect you with clinicians and researchers
from around the globe. The key is to find something that truly interests you.
That is hard to do as a medical student and even sometimes as a resident, as
productivity sometimes trumps true interest. However, at some point,
transitioning to a focus project / area which truly excites you and motivates
you will be paramount. The life of an academic surgeon is extremely busy, and I
have found that for most individuals, only the truly important endeavors have
lasting power. For me, the answer was not in the lab, but using my engineering
and mathematics background to study cost effectiveness and health care
economics.
You are an Academic Otolaryngologist. What in your opinion makes a
competitive applicant? What are you looking for in an applicant?
To
me, a competitive applicant is genuine. Most applicants in this day and age
have published extensively and have excellent grades and marks throughout their
schooling. What really sets people apart in my mind is motivation, enthusiasm,
and a track record / story to match. This is why interviews are so important
for residency. Beyond residency, reputation matter most. What well respected
physicians write and say about you carries the most weight. Honestly and
dedication are two qualities that all admissions committees look for in
Otolaryngology applicants.
What would you advise a medical student, aspiring to pursue a career in
Otolaryngology? How important is it to have proper mentoring during Medical
School and residency training?
As
I mentioned above, mentoring is critical in all phases of medical training.
This shouldn’t just be defined by a forced relationship with a high-ranking
physician (although having a mentor who is well known does help), rather
ideally it should be someone who you feel has an interest in seeing you succeed
and someone that you get along with well. Mentors come in all forms. Some you
will count on for clinical guidance, others for research. Mentors are like
windows into a specialty for medical students, revealing the true day-to-day
life of a clinician within a specialty you are considering and offering
critical advice when making important decisions along the way. I am still in
close contact with some of my mentors from medical school.
Skull Base surgery is heavily dependent on medical technology and has
evolved remarkably during the last decades (e.g. the endoscopic trans-nasal
sphenoid approach). Could you name 1-2 important turning points in your field
in the 21st century? How do you see the field in the next years?
Some
major technological advancements that allowed endoscopic skull base surgery to
flourish were high resolution, small caliber endoscopes in combination with
accurate and sophisticated image-guidance systems. Improving visualization and
surgical access led to confidence among surgeons that endoscopic surgery could
achieve expected goals in a safe manner. Just as important as technology
however was the evolution of endoscopic reconstructive techniques. Before that,
it did not matter if tumors could be resected endoscopically if a CSF leak
could not adequately repaired without an open approach and a peri-cranial flap.
The nasoseptal flap in particular was critical for endoscopic
reconstruction. Endoscopic skull base surgery has a bright future.
Techniques and surgical approaches are being refined and adapted to access
difficult to reach sites such as the infratemporal fossa, petrous apex, middle
cranial fossa, etc. I think in the next 20 years we will appreciate the
limitations of the endoscopic approach and refine techniques and reconstructive
techniques to improve not only mortality rates for skull base malignancies but
also long term quality of life for patients.
Could you please share one of your most rewarding and one of your most
challenging moments in your career?
It
is important to understand that challenging moments are inevitable as a
surgeon. I have learned this from my mentors as well as through my own
experience. It is critical to never become over-confident in your ability or
lose the attention to detail that will make you a great surgeon. An easy way to
never lose that is to truly treat each patient is if they were family. In that
sense, any complication or sub-optimal outcome, whether it be due to forces you
can control or not, weighs heavily on a surgeon. Always reflect on those
situations and try to learn from complications, both in training and as an
attending. A mentor of mine once said “You learn more from a single
complication than from 100 cases that go well.”
In
terms of rewarding moments, a career as a surgeon is filled with them. From
achieving surgical excellence and independence to watching your students do the
same, there are countless daily moments that are inspiring and fulfilling.
Nothing however surpasses the gratitude of a patient and their family after you
have treated and improved life for them. That never gets old. My advice would
be to chase that feeling.
No comments:
Post a Comment