Prof.
Argiris is a world-leading Oncologist with a particular interest in Head and
Neck Oncology. He did his Internal Medicine residency at Beth Israel Medical
Center (NY, USA), and then specialized in Hematology/ Oncology at Yale
University School of Medicine (CT, USA) and he is doubly board-certified in
Internal Medicine and Medical Oncology. He is Professor of Medical Oncology at
the Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, (PA, USA) and
Adjunct Professor of Medicine at the Department of Medicine, University of
Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio (TX, USA). Besides his clinical
appointments, Prof. Argiris is actively involved in basic and clinical
research. He is the author of more than 130 articles and book chapters and his
work has received more than 7000 citations. He is a member and holds several
key positions in prestigious cancer societies in Europe and USA, including:
European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO), American Society of Clinical
Oncology (ASCO), American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) and European
Organization for Research Treatment and Cancer (EORTC).
Read
below, his very interesting answers to
THE HEAD AND NECK BLOG!
1. Prof. Argiris, from the broad scope
of Oncology, why did you choose to Head and Neck Oncology? What makes this
field special for you?
This
is fascinating field that I chose early on in my career as I joined the faculty
at Northwestern University in 2000. It gave me the opportunity to work with
colleagues from different specialties and develop new approaches in the
multimodality management of head and neck cancer.
“I
suggest being enthusiastic and
working
long hours !”
2. What are the most important
qualities of an aspiring cancer researcher today? Are there any common pitfalls
one should avoid?
A
career in research, basic or clinical, comes with many challenges, and requires
efforts for decades. A key for success is good mentorship and the ability to
compete successfully for grants. As a clinician one has to focus on patient
care and at the same time balance clinical research activities. This is not always easy. However, it is very
rewarding when new therapies enter the clinic and make a difference in patient
outcomes.
3. What do you expect to change in the
field, in terms of clinical practice over the next decade? Should we expect
that the novel, targeted immunotherapies will transform Head and Neck Cancer
management?
A
new therapeutic area that has revolutionized cancer treatment is immunotherapy.
Immunotherapy has shown benefit in patients with head and neck cancer who have
previously received chemotherapy. Currently, there are multiple ongoing
clinical trials that investigate immunotherapy in the first-line treatment of
recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer as well as in combination with
chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced disease. It is anticipated that
opportunities for cure will be enhanced with the new therapies. Moreover, we
are hopeful that biomarkers will be used for better patient selection.
4. How difficult is it to translate
basic science research into clinical applications? How can we avoid poor
reproducibility and mistakes that eventually limit the applicability of
laboratory findings in clinical medicine?
This
is a difficult question and I am afraid there is no good answer. Unfortunately,
very often promising laboratory results do not translate into clinical benefit.
Having a very strong biologic rationale and having exceptional preclinical data
is very important in order to pursue a new therapy in patients. For example,
pursuing therapy against activating mutations has been a successful theme for
new agents in certain malignancies.
“Unfortunately,
very often promising laboratory results do not translate into clinical benefit.
Having a very strong biologic rationale and having exceptional preclinical data
is very important in order to pursue a new therapy in patients.”
5. Is there a role for surgeons in
basic/ clinical cancer research? Do you think they can contribute in a
multidisciplinary cancer research team?
Specialists
in head and neck surgery play a major role in the evaluation and treatment of
head and neck cancer patients. They obviously play a major role in the
development of new multimodality treatment strategies. When head and neck
surgeons are also scientists they have unique opportunities to study a disease
that it is usually amenable to repeat tumor sampling. With my colleagues at Thomas
Jefferson University we are developing a number of window of opportunity trials
in which we are prescribing immunotherapy before surgery. This study design allows
us to collect information about the changes in various tissues and biologic
samples after treatment with the ultimate goal of finding a biomarker for
response.
“When head and neck surgeons are also scientists they
have unique opportunities to study a disease that it is usually amenable to repeat
tumor sampling.”
6. What would you advise a student
aspiring to follow a career in Head and Neck Cancer?
It
is a growing scientific field and is certainly worthwhile to pursue a career in
this area. I suggest being enthusiastic and working long hours!
Thank
you very much Professor Argiris for sharing your knowledge, your experience and
your ideas with THE HEAD AND NECK BLOG. It is a great honor to include you in the
Expert Opinions Section!
No comments:
Post a Comment